I am back from the JAOO conference that is happening this week in Aarhus, a city in the west part of the Denmark.
Jonas and I had the opportunity to speak there, and since I feel that there is only a little coverage of it in the blog
community, I have decided to take care of that DK duty.
This post won't give you the right view on this conference, since I attented to my own fields related session aka AOP related, but anyway, you will have a minimum.
The conference
The conference is this year largely sponsored by Microsoft, among others of the .Net or Java ground. Great guys are speaking there, like Rod Johnson (Spring / Interface21 - you know him), Rickard Oberg (former JBoss ejb guy, closed source AOP/CMS lead at Senselogic) , Martin Fowler, Arno Schmidmeier (early AspectJ user, AOSD consultant), Peter Von der Ahé (javac Sun guy), Jonas Bonér and myself to name a few and a bunch of .Net guys.
Though the conference location was a bit far from the airport, the accomodation was good, lunches were fine, with DK stuff but not too much for a FR guy, and the monday night social party was pretty good.
Day 1 - Keynote by Microsoft
I have attended the monday keynote given by a Microsoft guy. It was a good insight to see what MS is attempting to achieve, thinking ahead the C# things while people are just excited about the upcoming release of a new Visual C# things.
it was interesting to hear about how clever is Microsoft when it leads to the latest Java 5 Tiger new features, which are some sort of compiler trick for most of them.
In .Net, when you have an int, this one is an object, and there is boxing / unboxing features somehow, but the int himself is reflectively accessible. In the Java world we have blessed (or cursed as Jonas said...) primitive types (int ...) and boxed types (Integer etc), and Tiger provides boxing and unboxing but thru a compiler trick - that is the bytecode will make use of yourInteger.intValue() and Integer.valueOf(yourint) under the hood.
Microsoft gave a bunch of other samples, and admitted that it was somehow easier to start a good language desgin from scratch that sketching on an existing one.
Day 1 - Sessions
I did not attended more on monday morning since I had to prepare some for our own session and I hope to see someone providing feedback on it since it is not fair to write it myself but still...
Annotation driven AOP with AspectWerkz
Jonas and I were giving a talk in the J2SE track on Annotation and AOP.
We started with an AOP crash course just to get everyone on the train.
Then we explained how Tiger annotations are used in AspectWerkz to have annotation defined aspects (something that JBoss has recently lazily followed).
Annotations are also used in AspectWerkz as a matching mechanism, and we went thru a sample where it is perfectely safe to refactor your methods without taking care about the underlying AOP without any whatever IDE plugings.
You can check our slides there, but for the impatient, here is how our strongly typed matching aspect looks like for annotation driven AOP. As you can see, there is no string based, wildcard based magic there.
// Annotation driven AOP
// Sample of strongly typed matching
// in AspectWerkz AOP with annotations
@Service
public class Math {
@Async
public Result complexComputation(Arguments args) {
...// this may take a while - we should do it in another thread
}
}
public class AsyncAspect {
@Around
@Within(Service.class)
@Execution(Async.class)
Object doAsynchronously(JoinPoint joinpoint) {
...
}
}
The session went fine, and the room was pretty much full, with around 400 attendees and after the session we met and chatted some with Rickard Oberg.
After that we had a sort of J2SE panel, which turned out to be a BOF since the JAOO crew had not provided us with a moderator. It ended up in discussing some details and pitfalls in the new Tiger features, like generics and static import.
Night 1 - All conferences are about social events
In the afternoon we met Arno Schmidmeier, an early AspectJ user (meaning late 90's), who is now doing AOSD consulting in Germany (give him a call if you need some AspectJ on-site knowledge), and we then head up to the social event / party with Rod Johnson. Time to share a bunch of beers paid by JAOO sponsors (Microsoft, Borland, Quest, and then I don't really remember) while discussing ideas about Proxy based AOP as in Spring, Geronimo integration, Spring AOP container for AspectWerkz, and some other things.
Day 2 - Sessions
On day 2 I had to leave early and get back at work so I could only make it for Arno and Rickard'sessions and missed Rod' session unfortunately.
AOP - let the code looks like the design
Arno Schmidmeier gave a talk in the Domain Driven Development track, where the main point was to explain how AOP could allow you to let the code looks like the design.
He went thru some use-cases he had seen during his consultancy jobs, and the most interesting part of the session was when he explained how an expression for a domain requirements like "for every successfull bank account operation the accont balance must be checked after the operation and in case of failure, an error should be triggered by the system and the system notified that it should rollabck etc." could be mapped to an AspectJ after returning aspect and thus making his points that AOP enables you to have the code look like the design while avoiding code tangling issues.
Attendees raised questions about code readability, modelling issues and similarities to a predicate language approach. I would have liked to see a running samples in AJDT and alike, and be able to navigate thru the aspects, and may be emphasis more on the domain level pointcuts idea.
Rickard experiences on AOP
I attended Rickard talk about experiences on AOP.
Rickard ellaborated a talk around many of the complex use-case he has for AOP in his company (Senselogic) CMS platform. He started with some classis technical domain concerns, and then jumped on his idea of interface driven system, where an object is actually decomposed in an assembly of entities, each one having a defined stack of advices attached to it.
This approach, which seems quite close to quantum AOP concepts, opens for a bunch of interesting things when it comes to GUI update propagation and server to server replication of sub-graph of persistable objects as well as undo/redo management which again should propagate...
Rickard introduced the idea of a "property=development|production|whatever" pointcut element, that allows for sort of global on/off on the pointcuts. Something you can achieve with a "if" pointcut in AspectJ - although he probably did implemented it at weave time and not at runtime unlike the AspectJ "if".
Rickard then explored the advantages and drawbacks of his "home made" AOP framework, and explained the idea of the abstract schema, where the aspect is abstract and then implements interface of classes where it is actually weaved to, providing sort of natural syntax for accessing the advice target instance methods from within the advice body.
He then went thru a small demo wich showed a nice swinguish things, and then went thru some ajdoc equivalent, where generated javadoc for a class/member is exposing which advices are bounded to it and thru which pointcut.
The next session was Rod Johnson session on Spring and Spring AOP. Unfortunately Jonas and I had to leave since mh, we are pretty busy these days.
Wrap up
Those 2 days were a good investement. I enjoyed the talk we gave there, and it was nice to meet and discuss more with people like Rod, Arno and Rickard.
JAOO has probably a lot more to offer, even if you are on the .net side or on both side (ThoughtWorks had a booth there by the way).
I had some time to think about Rickard abstract schema and experiment some more on Tiger annotations - something I will try to blog about soon.
Get to see the schedule and the JAOO slides there.
Below are some picts of Jonas, Arno, Rickard.
Jonas speaking
Arno session
Rickard explaining his Abstract Schema
Posts
