Monday, March 31, 2008

Esper maturity and open source maturity models

Esper has definitely reached an exciting maturity already. There are many things happening, both controlled and uncontrolled, and this is what makes open source so powerful to widespread new paradigms such as CEP.

There has been some thoughts and criteria on what makes an open source project or product mature or not. The common criterias are:
On the community side (ie widespread interest and growing number of knowledgeable people around it)
  • coverage in leading conference, by the core team (somewhat sponsored then) or by virtually any volunteer speaker ("raise your hand if you have some smart thing to say")

  • use by/integration with/ other open source projects or initiatives in a loosely controlled/sponsored way ("innovation happens elsewhere" kind of effect)

  • coverage in good old technical books


On the enterprise side (ie more and more real-world deployments)

  • existence in a supported form, with full IP liability and possibly enterprise level certifications and features

  • actual real world use in such a form

  • apparition in technical requirements for job descriptions

  • actual roadmap and feature delivery



Here are some links of maturity models with such criterias:
QSOS
OSMM
industry analyst views
HP content

All those maturity criterias are matched today by Esper, and this is very exciting to watch and act upon this.
Here is what I can already wrap up:

  • dedicated coverage in JavaOne, TheServerSide, NoFluffJustStuff, JAX conference, and more coming. Half of the coverage was from volunteer speakers: Brian Sletten (Zepheira) and Papick G. Taboada. Links are:
    Esper slideware
    NoFluffJustStuff
    JAX 2007

  • integration prototype with Apache WS02 by Paul Fremantle (Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales at WSO2), and Apache/IONA Camel/ActiveMQ by James Strachan (Technical Director at IONA), David Greco and team. There is way more to do on that area of course.
    See WSO2 and Apache Camel

  • dedicated chapter in "OSWorkflow" by Diego Adrian Naya Lazo, available on Amazon bookstore and any good bookstore. It covers Event Driven SOA, Event Driven BPM and Esper enabled BAM in a dedicated chapter!
    Here at Packt or on Amazon

  • growth of EsperTech as a company with a dual licensing and professional support model, including a wider product portfolio with f.e. EsperHA

  • more OEM agreements, more supported customers (see a few referencable names)

  • apparition in job descriptions f.e. here by SunGard / Finetix
    Here on MySpace or from Finetix directly
  • Esper is now in version 2.0, with 2.1 at the corner, with a version about every 3 months with a chunk of features that is most often here to match real-world demand



On the common things I hear is that NEsper, the Esper .Net/C# version is "lagging a bit behind". For one reason this is because the NEsper team is somewhat iterating on it as a port initiative thus always slightly with a version behind, and for another reason is perhaps that the .Net community is not as large and disparate as the Java community to digest new concepts somewhat that fast (and so is it with NHibernate, Spring Net, and a bunch of other products initially started in the Java world)

I am really looking forward to 2008 and beyond!
and I am already pleased to announce that Esper will get coverage at JAX India 2008 (nice job Papick) - abstract available here and that Tom' TheServerSide Symposium 2008 Las Vegas slides are available online.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Esper adds HA, local cache and resiliency to CEP with EsperHA

EsperTech has released its first non open source product EsperHA.
EsperHA is an extension to Esper the leading open source ESP/CEP event processing engine for Java. It essentially adds key features to match common enterprise deployments requirements:
- continuous query results can be made resilient and recovered if a crash occurs
- they can deal with large data window with an overflow / page out to disk option (f.e. keep a 20 days moving average VWAP, or find causality between events over long periods of time - countless of use cases)
- can simply make EPL statement durable so that they are re instantiated upon recovery / restart


From the announcement there is much more to look at, and the fact that all this comes at no code change, with fine level statement-level and stream-level configuration means that one can scale up or down its Esper applications with minimal effort.
By contrast, Esper keeps everything in live memory which provides excellent throughput and low latency (see some figures here) but is 1/ bounded (few G or more likely 32G to 128G in real deployments) and 2/ is dropped upon shutdown / crash.
EsperHA ensures one can trade-off low latency, high throughput and full resiliency in one system.

This is an interesting crossroad for EsperTech as a company as it further strengthen its positioning and readiness for real world deployments, and nicely complements its so far professional open source / dual license model with a classic software vendor one.
There was already great evidence of Esper fit for purpose in real world situations, as OEM and actual deployments demonstrated so far, but having this HA / resiliency option will certainly reinforce this.

There is common FUD from classic / elephant vendors thrown at open source software - essentially saying that it is not enterprise ready, not operable, as it is made by a bunch of volunteers that don't care about production reliability. This seems EsperHA and EsperTech proof point how much of FUD are that kind of claims.

You can sign up for a free trial and gain access to the download, docs and samples here.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Lab49 - have you looked at Esper?

Lab49 folks have been quite verbose in the Complex Event Processing (CEP) arena for financial services. They basically ended up partnering with pretty much anyone and almost every single month, skip to another CEP vendor to partner with.
Nice but certainly tough to build up and scale up product expertise especially given there is no much standard in the CEP arena so far - but that definitely gives them a nice view on each products.

To complete their 360° they should definitely look at Esper and EsperTech offering, including also NEsper as they seem to be quite involved in .Net as well. They probably know where to reach out for that, and will certainly hear about it anyway as the number of deployments of (N)Esper in financial services is growing nicely.

Few history on Lab49 ' somewhat fuzzy logic about partners:
- February 2008 - Aleri and Lab49 Partner on Tool to Visualize Market Liquidity
- January 2008 - BEA-Intel-Lab49 Whitepaper on CEP in Capital Markets (you can also find a more recent much vendor influenced podcast)
- November 2007 - Real-Time Trading and Industry Networking Event with Lab49 at StreamBase
- June 2007 - Coral8 and Lab49 Partner to Provide Algorithmic Trading Framework on the Microsoft Software Platform

Now you know what partner means. We are all partners to make the point that CEP brings business value, and Lab49 does it well in financial services I think.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Open Source ESBs and Esper CEP

Stefan Ried, a former SoftwareAG now at Forrester has given an interesting take on possible strategies for Open Source ESBs during a recent Expert Meeting on BPM/BAM/CEP/SOA/EDA.

You can read it from there.
It is interesting to see CEP in the ESB capabilities list for 2008 (as a reminder 2008 is this year). This trend is definitely an interesting one, and folks like WSO2/Synapse have actually already done some prototype work with Esper - as described here on Paul' blog.

You can definitely bet you'll hear much more about those ESBs / CEP integration with Esper throughout this year, despite it is already doable without federating capabilities in one server but using an ESB and an Esper event server bridged together with any kind of transport(JMS f.e.). This has the benefit of keeping the ESB stateless, rather than making it stateful (I consider CEP to be of a stateful kind) but certainly makes the architecture slightly more advanced so I am sure either ways will find their fans.

Open Source Event-Driven SOA is right on Esper' track and WSO2/Synapse has definitely made some good steps forward already despite productization is not yet there right now. Let's wish Mule and JBossESB catch up so as to provide users choices yet consistent CEP semantics - thru Esper of course!

Monday, January 7, 2008

Backup your data with MirrorFolder

I thought I'd blog about a great affordable piece of Windows Software: MirrorFolder. It provides a software level real-time RAID-1 mode that can backup files in real time, and I am also largely using the option to auto-synchronize my backups upon connection of my USB hard drives. There is also a whole bunch of options for fine grained configuration.

The 4.x version now includes a centralized GUI that is a great complement to the Windows shell integration (right click on a folder to configure its backup strategy).
Get it from Techsoft. It's 39 US$ so close to just 20 euros these days. Lucky me.